There is a lot talk about whoami.exe recently, so here’s one more post about it…<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When we talk about whoami.exe we often think of it in ‘atomic’ terms. You run it, and you get the results. But by doing so we assume a lot i.e. we kinda indirectly know that we are talking about the executable located in this place:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Of course, some of us know that there is also a 32-bit version on the 64-bit OS:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
and then a bunch of copies in WinSxS directory (file names are versioned):<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And of course, we can reveal the hard links for each of these tools using fsutil:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plus, on Windows Arm, we have:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
and respective WinSxS directory (file names are versioned):<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But there is more…<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If you ever installed cygwin, you probably know of:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is also GIT for Windows that installs a lot of windows-friendly Unix tools including, yes, you guessed right, whoami.exe:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
At this stage, you probably are aware that Program Files is a nightmare as it occurs in many architecture-specific forms<\/a>, and many localized versions<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You must be thinking now – this thing is multiplying quickly and spreading faster than covid!<\/p>\n\n\n\n But this is not THE END. There really is more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A Pro version of software called System Scheduler installs the following whoami.exe file:<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is probably the first ever whoami.exe I have ever seen that shows the user info on GUI – as a message box \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n\n\n\n Then comes another contender, a tool called MacroCommanderPro:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yes, it is also GUI-based whoami \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n\n\n\n And this is just a tip of an iceberg…<\/p>\n\n\n\n The reason I write about all this is because some people like to say ‘the moment someone runs whoami.exe on one of your systems, this is an indication of early stages of compromise!’. Their confidence is built on ignorance. And yes, they may be right… yeah…but they are often very wrong… <\/p>\n\n\n\n Telemetry we deal with today is rich and useful, but threat hunting – as a discipline – is still in its early, naive stages. It’s healthy to assume that for every rule written, for every assumption, there is an exception that can be found and not only that — you will very often find it by combing telemetry generated by non-malicious sources…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" There is a lot talk about whoami.exe recently, so here’s one more post about it… When we talk about whoami.exe we often think of it in ‘atomic’ terms. You run it, and you get the results. But by doing so … Continue reading \n
\n